
What does "atomic" mean in programming? - Stack Overflow
May 8, 2015 · In the Effective Java book, it states: The language specification guarantees that reading or writing a variable is atomic unless the variable is of type long or double [JLS, 17.4.7]. What do...
c++ - What exactly is std::atomic? - Stack Overflow
Aug 13, 2015 · Objects of atomic types are the only C++ objects that are free from data races; that is, if one thread writes to an atomic object while another thread reads from it, the behavior is well-defined. …
c++ - the gist behind atomic shared pointer - Stack Overflow
Jan 23, 2025 · At least atomic<shared_ptr<T>> gives you per-object locking, instead of a single lock for the whole stack. So multiple threads can be waiting for different locks if multiple pops start in parallel.
What are atomic types in the C language? - Stack Overflow
Apr 30, 2016 · I remember I came across certain types in the C language called atomic types, but we have never studied them. So, how do they differ from regular types like int,float,double,long etc., and …
Is there a difference between the _Atomic type qualifier and type ...
Oct 20, 2014 · Why the standard make that difference? It seems as both designate, in the same way, an atomic type.
sql - What is atomicity in dbms - Stack Overflow
Jun 4, 2014 · The definition of atomic is hazy; a value that is atomic in one application could be non-atomic in another. For a general guideline, a value is non-atomic if the application deals with only a …
reference assignment is atomic so why is Interlocked.Exchange(ref ...
reference assignment is atomic so why is Interlocked.Exchange (ref Object, Object) needed? Reference assignment is atomic. Interlocked.Exchange does not do only reference assignment. It does a read …
Is there a way to get a pointer to the underlying value of std::atomic?
Nov 22, 2023 · A std::atomic<int> is not an int, and it isn't required to contain one. Even in the likely case that the object representations of them are the same, it is a strict aliasing violation to reinterpret_cast …
java - Why is i++ not atomic? - Stack Overflow
Aug 7, 2014 · i++ is probably not atomic in Java because atomicity is a special requirement which is not present in the majority of the uses of i++. That requirement has a significant overhead: there is a …
When should you use std::atomic instead of std::mutex?
When is_lock_free returns false, it means that atomic has a lock, and equivalent performance with code with locks. This does not mean that you should always use atomic instead of mutex-based approach, …